[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1012252144030.10759@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 21:45:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Steffen Klassert <klassert@...hematik.tu-chemnitz.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: Don't assign when a comparison is intended
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In drivers/net/3c59x.c::vortex_probe1() we have this code:
> >
> > if (gendev) {
> > if ((pdev = DEVICE_PCI(gendev))) {
> > print_name = pci_name(pdev);
> > }
> >
> > if ((edev = DEVICE_EISA(gendev))) {
> > print_name = dev_name(&edev->dev);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > I believe these assignments were intended to be comparisons.
> > If I'm correct, then here's a patch to fix that up.
>
> I don't think so. Look at the extra brackets.
>
> The code can also written as:
>
> pdev = DEVICE_PCI(gendev);
> if(pdev)
> print_name = pci_name(pdev);
>
Arrgh, I completely missed that - damn.
You are correct I think and my patch is wrong.
Thanks for taking a look.
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists