[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D166E9D.5080200@hartkopp.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 23:22:21 +0100
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
CC: Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CAN: Use inode instead of kernel address for /proc file
On 25.12.2010 23:16, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> Since the socket address is just being used as a unique identifier, its
> inode number is an alternative that does not leak potentially sensitive
> information.
>
> CC-ing stable because MITRE has assigned CVE-2010-4565 to the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
> Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Thanks Dan.
> ---
> net/can/bcm.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index 6faa825..5748901 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
> @@ -1520,8 +1520,8 @@ static int bcm_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len,
> bo->bound = 1;
>
> if (proc_dir) {
> - /* unique socket address as filename */
> - sprintf(bo->procname, "%p", sock);
> + /* socket inode as filename */
> + sprintf(bo->procname, "%lx", sock_i_ino(sk));
> bo->bcm_proc_read = proc_create_data(bo->procname, 0644,
> proc_dir,
> &bcm_proc_fops, sk);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists