netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] dcbnl: adding DCBX feature flags get-set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1293631553.29378.30.camel@lb-tlvb-shmulik.il.broadcom.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:05:53 +0200
From:	"Shmulik Ravid" <shmulikr@...adcom.com>
To:	"John Fastabend" <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
cc:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>,
	"Liu, Lucy" <lucy.liu@...el.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] dcbnl: adding DCBX feature flags
 get-set


On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 16:15 -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 11:32 AM, Shmulik Ravid wrote:
> > Adding a pair of set-get functions to dcbnl for setting the negotiation
> > flags of the various DCB features. The user sets these flags (enable,
> > advertise, willing) for each feature to be used by the device DCBX
> > engine. The 'get' routine returns which of the features is enabled
> > after the negotiation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ravid <shmulikr@...adcom.com>
> 
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> 
> Dave, these are going to conflict with my patches
> 
> [net-next-2.6,1/3] dcbnl: add support for ieee8021Qaz attributes
> [net-next-2.6,2/3] dcbnl: add appliction tlv handlers
> 
> If needed either Shmulik or myself can work out the conflicts if you want a single series that applies cleanly.
> 
> Thanks,
> John.

John, 

Since I need to modify my patches I can resubmit them on top of your
patches above so that they would need to be applied after yours are. Is
this a good way to resolve the conflicts ?

Thanks,
Shmulik  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html