[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110103.092214.193706896.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:22:14 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: xiaosuo@...il.com
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: check the length of skb after
nf_bridge_maybe_copy_header()
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 18:44:59 +0800
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 3:10 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
>> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 21:41:30 +0800
>>
>>> Since nf_bridge_maybe_copy_header() may change the length of skb,
>>> we should check the length of skb after it to handle the ppoe skbs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
>>
>> This is really strange.
>>
>> packet_length() subtracts VLAN_HLEN from the value it returns, so the
>> correct fix seems to be to make this function handle the PPPOE case
>> too.
>>
>
> It is correct. The actual MTU of 802.1q frame is 4 bytes larger. For
> example, the MTU of ethernet is normally 1500, however the actual MTU
> of the 802.1Q is 1504.
Yes, I understand this, but I don't see why packet_length() cannot
simply account for PPPOE's encapsulation overhead just as it does for
VLAN's special MTU considerations.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists