netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Simplified 16 bit Toeplitz hash algorithm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:02:44 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	therbert@...gle.com
Cc:	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Simplified 16 bit Toeplitz hash algorithm

From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:47:20 -0800

> I'm not sure why this would be needed.  What is the a advantage in
> making the TX and RX queues match?

That's how their hardware based RFS essentially works.

Instead of watching for "I/O system calls" like we do in software, the
chip watches for which TX queue a flow ends up on and matches things
up on the receive side with the same numbered RX queue to match.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html