netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net: Allow ethtool to set interface in loopback mode.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D23CAA5.7060902@hp.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:34:29 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: Allow ethtool to set interface in loopback mode.

>>>Since this is a boolean it SHOULD go into ethtool_flags rather than
>>>being a high level operation.
>>
>>It could do, but I though ETHTOOL_{G,S}FLAGS were intended for
>>controlling offload features.
> 
> 
> It just seems the number of hooks keeps growing which takes more space
> and increases complexity.

Is there any complication/downside to using flags in the (un?)likely event of 
wanting different flavors of loopback in the card?

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html