[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294352011.11825.50.camel@bwh-desktop>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:13:31 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: Allow ethtool to set interface in loopback
mode.
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:22 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 08:21 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:36 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:30:01 -0800
> >> Mahesh Bandewar<maheshb@...gle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This patch enables ethtool to set the loopback mode on a given interface.
> >>> By configuring the interface in loopback mode in conjunction with a policy
> >>> route / rule, a userland application can stress the egress / ingress path
> >>> exposing the flows of the change in progress and potentially help developer(s)
> >>> understand the impact of those changes without even sending a packet out
> >>> on the network.
> >>>
> >>> Following set of commands illustrates one such example -
> >>> a) ip -4 addr add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth1
> >>> b) ip -4 rule add from all iif eth1 lookup 250
> >>> c) ip -4 route add local 0/0 dev lo proto kernel scope host table 250
> >>> d) arp -Ds 192.168.1.100 eth1
> >>> e) arp -Ds 192.168.1.200 eth1
> >>> f) sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind=1
> >>> g) sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_local=1
> >>> # Assuming that the machine has 8 cores
> >>> h) taskset 000f netserver -L 192.168.1.200
> >>> i) taskset 00f0 netperf -t TCP_CRR -L 192.168.1.100 -H 192.168.1.200 -l 30
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar<maheshb@...gle.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Ben Hutchings<bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> >>
> >> Since this is a boolean it SHOULD go into ethtool_flags rather than
> >> being a high level operation.
> >
> > It could do, but I though ETHTOOL_{G,S}FLAGS were intended for
> > controlling offload features.
>
> It doesn't have to be. As Stephen guessed, [GS]FLAGS are basically
> common flags -- as differentiated from private,
> driver-specific/hardware-specific flags.
Well, that would allow the patch to be simplified quite a bit. :-)
Ben.
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Define ETH_FLAG_LOOPBACK
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:10:55 +0000
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> requested this, writing:
By configuring the interface in loopback mode in conjunction with a policy
route / rule, a userland application can stress the egress / ingress path
exposing the flows of the change in progress and potentially help developer(s)
understand the impact of those changes without even sending a packet out
on the network.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
--- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
+++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
@@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ struct ethtool_perm_addr {
* flag differs from the read-only value.
*/
enum ethtool_flags {
+ ETH_FLAG_LOOPBACK = (1 << 2), /* Host-side loopback enabled */
ETH_FLAG_TXVLAN = (1 << 7), /* TX VLAN offload enabled */
ETH_FLAG_RXVLAN = (1 << 8), /* RX VLAN offload enabled */
ETH_FLAG_LRO = (1 << 15), /* LRO is enabled */
---
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists