[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294432468.2520.24.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 20:34:28 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <benh@...ian.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 11:49 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> [ Apart from the annoyance of also having to manually copying the
> firmware files: why the heck doesn't that firmware tree even have a
> "make firmware-install" makefile or something? The kernel has a "make
> firmware-install" thing, why doesn't the firmware tree itself have
> that?
Yeah, the main reason I haven't yet submitted a patch to remove the
legacy firmware/ directory from the kernel source, as discussed at the
Kernel Summit, is because I need to implement some makefiles for the
firmware tree first.
I'll do a 'make install' for the firmware tree which installs it all,
and lets you specify min/max kernel versions so you can omit stuff that
*really* isn't relevant.
I also want to preserve the CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL option, but that
can't easily be based on the hardcoded knowledge of the config options;
it wants to be based on the MODULE_FIRMWARE tags of the built-in
drivers. And once we're enumerating those, it should be relatively
simple to warn about missing firmwares in the non-FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL
case too.
I didn't find the time to do that for the 2.6.38 merge window, but I
should get it done for 2.6.39.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists