netdev - Re: [RFC] sched: QFQ - quick fair queue scheduler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110107200234.3f5e7ff8@nehalam>
Date:	Fri, 7 Jan 2011 20:02:34 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@....unipi.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: QFQ - quick fair queue scheduler

On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 10:56:33 +0800
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> wrote:

> > +       cl->bstats.packets += skb_is_gso(skb)?skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs:1;  
> 
> Hmm, there is no other packets schedulers which account packets in
> this way. Which one is better? I am not sure. And in this patch,
> qstats.drops isn't maintained in the same way. Would these two be
> consistent.

HTB uses this accounting.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html