[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D2A291A.4040204@netfilter.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 22:31:06 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next-2.6] netfilter: x_tables: dont block BH while
reading counters
On 08/01/11 17:45, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> David,
>
> I am resending this patch, sent 3 weeks ago, Patrick gave no answer.
>
> I believe it should be included in linux-2.6.38 and stable kernels.
>
> Some people found they had to change NIC RX ring sizes in order not
> missing frames (from 1024 to 2048), while root cause of the problem was
> this.
>
> Quoting Jesper : "I can now hit the system with a pktgen at 128 bytes,
> and see no drops/overruns while running iptables. (This packet load at
> 128bytes is 822 kpps and 840Mbit/s) (iptables ruleset is the big chains:
> 20929 rules: 81239)."
I have enqueued this patch to me tree.
http://1984.lsi.us.es/git/?p=net-2.6/.git;a=summary
I'll pass it to davem for -stable submission.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists