[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201101101244.24932.christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:44:24 +0100
From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup include/net/tcp.h include-files and coding-style
On Monday, January 10, 2011 wrote Alexey Dobriyan:
> >> linux/percpu_counter.h (needed for percpu_counter_sum_positive)
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Currently code compiles fine, so necessary headers are in place,
> so simply adding new headers doesn't help anything.
I totally agree with you.
However we need a consistent coding style.
Or we just include the minimum necessary headers (as originally proposed by
me).
Or we include every header whose structs/functions are referenced.
In my opinion the current "mixed" state is not ok, because some includes are
there because there *are* references (even if these includes could be omitted,
e.g., linux/list.h).
Other includes (like linux/percpu_counter.h) are not there, because they are
indirectly included by another header and thus the code compiles. Even if
there are references.
And there are no rules/guidelines to identify the headers that should be
included and those that should not.
Regards,
Christoph
--
Christoph Paasch
PhD Student
IP Networking Lab --- http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be
MultiPath TCP in the Linux Kernel --- http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/mptcp
Université Catholique de Louvain
www.rollerbulls.be
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists