[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294782001.17531.16.camel@wall-e>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:40:01 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...tta.com, jj@...osbits.net, daniel.baluta@...il.com,
jochen@...hen.org, hagen@...u.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol
Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> Le mardi 11 janvier 2011 à 22:14 +0100, Stefani Seibold a écrit :
>
> > If nobody need it and no user in the near future out there, why should i
> > implement this? That is dogmatic only!
> >
>
> Sure !
>
> Problem is linux kernel code is not your own project.
>
> Some community rules must be respected.
>
> You call this dogmatic, you are right, since this makes your life less
> easy.
>
Sorry thats not right, i only want write code for the trash bin.
> However, for hundred of people working to maintain/improve linux kernel
> code, especially in network stacks, this ends in less stress, when a
> problem must be located, and fixed.
>
> Note : We are trying to help you, not fighting against you, in the long
> term, its a win-win for everybody.
>
>
Sure, i know this and i would give you and all other contributers a big
thank you for the review.
But it should also okay, to argues against some proposal which makes
currently no sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists