[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294782386.3447.21.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:46:26 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...tta.com, jj@...osbits.net, daniel.baluta@...il.com,
jochen@...hen.org, hagen@...u.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol
Le mardi 11 janvier 2011 à 22:41 +0100, Stefani Seibold a écrit :
> Second, the design is may in your opinion poor. I like it. What is
> really poor is the kernel_...() socket functions, which are only simple
> wrapper of the system calls without any performance improvement, skb
> support and memory saving.
>
The only thing you want is to have a callback to your own code to
deliver an decapsulated skb to your state machine.
Take a look at other layers on top of UDP
(L2TP comes to mind)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists