[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110111223843.GB18762@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:38:43 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@...com>,
"Socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de" <Socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3 1/1] can: c_can: Added support for
Bosch C_CAN controller
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:01:47PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 01/11/2011 07:25 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I was told that Bosch's page for the C_CAN is here:
> >
> > http://www.semiconductors.bosch.de/en/ipmodules/can/canipmodules/c_can/c_can.asp
> >
> > There it's also written for what bus interfaces the C_CAN is available for, e.g.:
> >
> > "The ASIC version is delivered with the AMBA APB bus interface from ARM."
>
> On ARM we also have the AMBA bus abstraction in Linux, but I've never
> worked with it. IIRC Wolfram (Cc'ed) has recently touched it.
For a programmer, it feels very much like a platform-bus (you can even use
amba-devices on a platform_bus); it has the advantage of some identification
registers at the end of the address-space. The rest is more about how to
connect the core to the SoC. Does that help? I don't know what the actual
question is :)
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists