netdev - Re: [RFC] sched: CHOKe packet scheduler (v0.6)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:27:39 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: CHOKe packet scheduler (v0.6)

On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:13:48 +0100
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi Stephen, here is my v0.6 version :
> 
> - Added sanity checks before kcalloc()/kzalloc()
> - Added a __GFP_NOWARN to kcalloc()
> - Added call to qdisc_bstats_update() after commit bfe0d0298f2a67d94d5
> (net_sched: factorize qdisc stats handling)
> 
> TODO :
> - Added a stat specific update to track CHOKe probabilistic dual-drops
>   I temporarily use requeues counter to make sure our code works

I am going to redo stats and config.
Should thresholds be packet or byte based? I prefer packet
Also leaning towards merging qmax and qlimit together.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html