[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinpw1DF-p=L1jn1Y1uATKaCQNy38Yf0_SQCBmHp@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:24:38 -0800
From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Laurent Chavey <chavey@...gle.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: Allow ethtool to set interface in loopback mode.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:22 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> On 01/04/2011 08:21 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:36 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:30:01 -0800
>> >> Mahesh Bandewar<maheshb@...gle.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> This patch enables ethtool to set the loopback mode on a given interface.
>> >>> By configuring the interface in loopback mode in conjunction with a policy
>> >>> route / rule, a userland application can stress the egress / ingress path
>> >>> exposing the flows of the change in progress and potentially help developer(s)
>> >>> understand the impact of those changes without even sending a packet out
>> >>> on the network.
>> >>>
>> >>> Following set of commands illustrates one such example -
>> >>> a) ip -4 addr add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth1
>> >>> b) ip -4 rule add from all iif eth1 lookup 250
>> >>> c) ip -4 route add local 0/0 dev lo proto kernel scope host table 250
>> >>> d) arp -Ds 192.168.1.100 eth1
>> >>> e) arp -Ds 192.168.1.200 eth1
>> >>> f) sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind=1
>> >>> g) sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_local=1
>> >>> # Assuming that the machine has 8 cores
>> >>> h) taskset 000f netserver -L 192.168.1.200
>> >>> i) taskset 00f0 netperf -t TCP_CRR -L 192.168.1.100 -H 192.168.1.200 -l 30
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar<maheshb@...gle.com>
>> >>> Reviewed-by: Ben Hutchings<bhutchings@...arflare.com>
>> >>
>> >> Since this is a boolean it SHOULD go into ethtool_flags rather than
>> >> being a high level operation.
>> >
>> > It could do, but I though ETHTOOL_{G,S}FLAGS were intended for
>> > controlling offload features.
>>
>> It doesn't have to be. As Stephen guessed, [GS]FLAGS are basically
>> common flags -- as differentiated from private,
>> driver-specific/hardware-specific flags.
>
> Well, that would allow the patch to be simplified quite a bit. :-)
>
> Ben.
>
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Subject: [PATCH net-2.6] ethtool: Define ETH_FLAG_LOOPBACK
> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:10:55 +0000
>
> Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> requested this, writing:
>
> By configuring the interface in loopback mode in conjunction with a policy
> route / rule, a userland application can stress the egress / ingress path
> exposing the flows of the change in progress and potentially help developer(s)
> understand the impact of those changes without even sending a packet out
> on the network.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Acked-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
>
> --- a/include/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ struct ethtool_perm_addr {
> * flag differs from the read-only value.
> */
> enum ethtool_flags {
> + ETH_FLAG_LOOPBACK = (1 << 2), /* Host-side loopback enabled */
> ETH_FLAG_TXVLAN = (1 << 7), /* TX VLAN offload enabled */
> ETH_FLAG_RXVLAN = (1 << 8), /* RX VLAN offload enabled */
> ETH_FLAG_LRO = (1 << 15), /* LRO is enabled */
> ---
I tried this one with e1000e driver changes. It works but the ethtool
changes are not very clean and I would still prefer the earlier patch
since changes are clean across the board. I'll post ethtool changes
soon.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists