netdev - Re: [PATCH v4] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: remove "no conntrack!"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1294937329.3570.304.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:48:49 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist 
	<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] netfilter: ipt_CLUSTERIP: remove "no conntrack!"

Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 à 17:35 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso a écrit :
> On 13/01/11 17:30, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On 13/01/11 15:39, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> Then, cluster match can be improved, I am sure you already have a patch
> >> for it.
> > 
> > what scenario could benefit from the destination-based hashing?
> 
> I'm telling this because it doesn't make too sense to me.

Me too ;)

But hash(source_IP, source_PORT) definitely make sense in some
workloads.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html