[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110113043037.GA17726@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:30:45 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 08/13] posix clocks: cleanup the CLOCK_DISPTACH macro
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:57:23PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> static clockid_t clock_get_array_id(const clockid_t id)
> {
> if (id >= 0)
> return id < MAX_CLOCKS ? id : POSIX_INV_CLOCK_ID;
>
> if (clock_is_posix_cpu(id))
> return POSIX_CPU_CLOCK_ID;
>
> return POSIX_INV_CLOCK_ID;
> }
>
> static inline int dispatch_clock_getres(const clockid_t id, struct timespec *ts)
> {
> struct k_clock *clk = &posix_clocks[clock_get_array_id(id)];
>
> return clk->clock_getres ? clk->clock_getres(id, ts) : -EINVAL;
> }
I would like to take this idea one step further, like so:
static struct k_clock *clockid_to_kclock(const clockid_t id)
{
if (id >= 0)
return id < MAX_CLOCKS ?
&posix_clocks[id] : &posix_clocks[POSIX_INV_CLOCK_ID];
...
}
SYSCALL( ... , const clockid_t id, struct timespec *ts)
{
struct k_clock *clk = clockid_to_kclock(id);
return clk->clock_getres ? clk->clock_getres(id, ts) : -EINVAL;
}
What do you think?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists