netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] etherdevice.h: Add is_unicast_ether

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1294908195.4114.43.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:43:15 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] etherdevice.h: Add is_unicast_ether_addr
 function

On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 09:35 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> On 2011-01-13 at 09:24:41 +0100, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> I added is_unicast_ether_addr to make the intention of checking for a
> unicast address clearer (see [1] for context).
> [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/183615
> > I can't think of much reason that a new function for
> > !multicast without the !is_zero is needed.
> Maybe I should just add something like the following?
> #define is_unicast_ether_addr(addr) is_valid_ether_addr(addr)

Adding the #define makes a bit more sense to me.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html