[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110113100224.GB30432@canuck.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:02:24 -0500
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...radead.org>
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, opurdila@...acom.com,
ddvlad@...edu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: devconf: start IPV4_DEVCONF_* from 0
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> Yes it works, but there does not seem to be a good reason why to
> complicate things like this (again the sentinel nature of zero is not
> used in any place here).
The reason I didn't change anything was the same as Dave's reply, I
thought it must have been done on purpose. It probably was but I can't
spot any reason now either.
Also, IPv6 is doing just fine with using '0' as its first devconf id.
I have no objects to changing this at all but we don't gain much either.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists