[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1101182139030.19166@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:39:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
cc: holger@...zenberger.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] ipset: make IPv4 and IPv6 address handling similar
On Tuesday 2011-01-18 21:37, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>> >>
>> >> this does not work for AF_INET6:
>> >>
>> >> ipset add foo6 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128
>> >> ipset v5.2: Syntax error: plain IP address must be supplied: 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128
>> >
>> >Yeah, the usual issue: should IPv4/32 and IPv6/128 be handled as a plain
>> >IPv4/v6 address when the manual says "enter a plain IPv4/v6 address" :-).
>>
>> (Assuming this was a question, heuristically based on the word order
>> you used:) I don't think so. iptables, resp. its modules, do not
>> allow that either.
>
>I know, but the situation is a little bit more complicated: the set type
>in question works differently with IPv4 and IPv6. In the IPv4 case, a
>range of IP addresses as IPv4/prefix is accepted as input (thus
>192.168.1.1/32 too), while for IPv6, only plain IPv6 addresses are allowed
>and therefore 20a1:1:2:3:4:5:6:7/128 was rejected.
Is there a specific reason that there is no IPv6 net support?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists