[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1101192248350.3211@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:53:02 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, therbert@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/5] genirq: Add IRQ affinity notifiers
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:39:04 +0100 (CET)
> > Nothing will happen and no hassels at all, because your tree and my
> > tree have the exact same commit with the exact same sha1. You don't
> > have further changes in your tree which touch genirq stuff and I don't
> > have anything which touches net.
>
> You said you had stuff before Ben's patches, and that's why you needed
> to provide me with an -rc1 relative version of his commits.
Sorry, I meant other stuff pending (not yet applied) which will
interfere with that patch. And even if I would have pending patches in
git already it would not matter:
tip/irq/core some stuff based on whatever
tip/irq/for-net single patch based on rc1
tip/irq/core merges tip/irq/for-net _before_ offering it to Linus
You pull tip/irq/for-net and nothing breaks :)
> If that's not the case, then yes it would work just fine.
>
> Just give me the URL to pull from, thanks!
Will do, give me a day or two !
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists