[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1101191858390.13633@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:04:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
cc: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
arthur.marsh@...ernode.on.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: inbound connection problems when "netlink: test for all flags
of the NLM_F_DUMP composite" commit applied
On Wednesday 2011-01-19 17:54, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
>I still don't understand why you call this the nonsense. There are
>two dump flags NLM_F_ROOT and NLM_F_MATCH plus for convenience
>NLM_F_DUMP as 2 in 1. Avahi uses these specific flags. Why would
>anybody have added these specific flags if they can never be used
>separately?
It looks like the authors' intentinos were to make NLM_F_MATCH not
stop after a single entry has been found. So that sounds like dump,
ok.
But NLM_F_ROOT does not quite strike me as a dump request. What if I
wanted just a single item returned but still start at the root?
Or asking from a different direction, what's NLM_F_ROOT good for
when, say, struct rtmsg->rtm_table specifies (in rtnetlink) where to
start? (Particularly, 0 for an "invisible root" that contains all
tables.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists