[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D378C3B.1020202@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:13:31 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/79] netfilter: netfilter update
On 20.01.2011 01:50, David Miller wrote:
> I'm undoing my pull, what was this build tested against?
My build tests didn't include header-install. No idea what Jan
tested against.
> In particular this commit breaks the build:
>
> Subject: [PATCH 68/79] netfilter: xtables: add missing header files to export list
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
> ...
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ header-y += xt_rateest.h
> header-y += xt_realm.h
> header-y += xt_recent.h
> header-y += xt_sctp.h
> +header-y += xt_secmark.h
> +header-y += xt_socket.h
> header-y += xt_state.h
> header-y += xt_statistic.h
> header-y += xt_string.h
>
> No active tree has a include/linux/netfilter/xt_secmark.h file. Therefore
> we end up with:
>
> make[2]: `scripts/unifdef' is up to date.
> make[4]: *** No rule to make target `/home/davem/src/GIT/net-next-2.6/include/linux/netfilter/xt_secmark.h', needed by `/home/davem/src/GIT/net-next-2.6/usr/include/linux/netfilter/.install'. Stop.
>
> Did you mean xt_SECMARK.h (caps)?
I guess so. Jan, please fix this up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists