[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1295587088.2613.51.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:18:08 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
Cc: bhutchings@...arflare.com, jarkao2@...il.com, hadi@...erus.ca,
shemminger@...tta.com, tgraf@...radead.org, nhorman@...driver.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: netif_setup_tc() is static
Le mercredi 19 janvier 2011 à 23:41 -0800, David Miller a écrit :
> From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:06:04 -0800
>
> > This patch provides a mechanism for lower layer devices to
> > steer traffic using skb->priority to tx queues.
> ...
> > Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
>
> Applied.
Hi John
Should netif_setup_tc() be static, or is it meant to be exported
somehow ?
[PATCH net-next-2.6] net: netif_setup_tc() is static
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 2730352..47d3d78 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ static void dev_queue_xmit_nit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
* expected that drivers will fix this mapping if they can before
* calling netif_set_real_num_tx_queues.
*/
-void netif_setup_tc(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txq)
+static void netif_setup_tc(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txq)
{
int i;
struct netdev_tc_txq *tc = &dev->tc_to_txq[0];
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists