[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110121.130657.106806953.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:06:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: jamie@...ible.transient.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc1: arp triggers RTNL assertion
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:52:56 +0100
> Here is how I fixed this, thanks again Jamie !
>
> [PATCH] net: neighbour: pneigh_lookup() doesnt need RTNL
Eric, I don't think we can do this.
Fundamentally, any time a user operation changes the configuration
of the networking, we must hold the RTNL.
Eliding the RTNL for lookups is fine, but for things that change
state it is not.
I therefore think you'll need to rework the arp_ioctl() portions
of the commit that introduced this regression.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists