netdev - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: fix compiler warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:34:23 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ipvs: fix compiler warnings

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 06:02:13PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
>> Fix compiler warnings when no transport protocol load balancing support
>> is configured.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c  |    4 +---
>>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c   |    4 ++++
>>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c |    4 ++++
>>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
>> index f36a84f..d889f4f 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
>> @@ -1894,9 +1894,7 @@ static int __net_init __ip_vs_init(struct net *net)
>>
>>  static void __net_exit __ip_vs_cleanup(struct net *net)
>>  {
>> -     struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = net_ipvs(net);
>> -
>> -     IP_VS_DBG(10, "ipvs netns %d released\n", ipvs->gen);
>> +     IP_VS_DBG(10, "ipvs netns %d released\n", net_ipvs(net)->gen);
>>  }
>>
>
> The hunk above seems unrelated to the problem described.
> The rest of the changes look good. I will double check and
> apply them to my tree.
>

Yes, is a separated patch needed? It is trivial. Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html