netdev - Re: [PATCH 14/20] staging/appletalk: remove the BKL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:29:26 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	arnd@...db.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/20] staging/appletalk: remove the BKL

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:17:28 +0100

> This changes appletalk to use lock_sock instead of
> lock_kernel for serialization. I tried to make sure
> that we don't hold the socket lock during sleeping
> functions, but I did not try to prove whether the
> locks are necessary in the first place.
> 
> Compile-tested only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

If you're moving appletalk to staging because "nobody is motivated
enough to remove the BKL" and then you actually do the work to remove
the BKL, I really don't see any point in doing the whole staging
thing.

We always keep an eye on every protocol that sits under the top-level
net/.  Every socket API change propagates, as does every other
networking API change that matters for those protocols.

You can move appletalk down to staging if that stops happening, which
it won't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html