| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20110125.142926.246535705.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:29:26 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: arnd@...db.de Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/20] staging/appletalk: remove the BKL From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:17:28 +0100 > This changes appletalk to use lock_sock instead of > lock_kernel for serialization. I tried to make sure > that we don't hold the socket lock during sleeping > functions, but I did not try to prove whether the > locks are necessary in the first place. > > Compile-tested only. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> If you're moving appletalk to staging because "nobody is motivated enough to remove the BKL" and then you actually do the work to remove the BKL, I really don't see any point in doing the whole staging thing. We always keep an eye on every protocol that sits under the top-level net/. Every socket API change propagates, as does every other networking API change that matters for those protocols. You can move appletalk down to staging if that stops happening, which it won't. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists