[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikYg6x-T42eSh-ou=bJr=16wLxoVYXON5qiyyvu@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:47:46 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/16] Intel net drivers: convert to ndo_fix_features
2011/1/22 Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>:
> Private rx_csum flags are now duplicate of netdev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM.
> Removing this needs deeper surgery.
>
> Since ixgbevf doesn't change hardware state on RX csum enable/disable
> its reset is avoided.
>
> Things noticed:
> - e1000, e1000e and ixgb have RX csum disabled by default
> - HW VLAN acceleration probably can be toggled, but it's left as is
> - the resets on RX csum offload change can probably be avoided
> - there is A LOT of copy-and-pasted code here
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
> ---
> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 69 ------------------------------------
> drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 30 +++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c | 62 --------------------------------
> drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 30 +++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/igb/igb_ethtool.c | 67 ----------------------------------
> drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c | 33 +++++++++++++----
> drivers/net/igbvf/ethtool.c | 57 -----------------------------
> drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c | 25 ++++++++++---
> drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb.h | 2 +
> drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_ethtool.c | 59 +------------------------------
> drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c | 65 ---------------------------------
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 31 +++++++++++-----
> drivers/net/ixgbevf/ethtool.c | 46 ------------------------
> drivers/net/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 26 +++++++++++---
> 15 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 461 deletions(-)
>
Upon initial reviews of the patch, we found issues with the e1000e
changes so far. We are working to put together a patch to resolve the
issues (and to do the conversion to ndo_fix_features). Based on the
initial work done by Michal, we can take care of the changes necessary
for the Intel Wired Ethernet drivers, and will wait for acceptance of
the net and ethtool changes before pushing the Intel patch. Is that
acceptable?
For e1000e, this patch breaks the ability to manually override the
default behavior of disabling TSO for 10/100, and there is some
additional cleanup that can be done w.r.t. Rx csum flags.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists