[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1296073390.2631.4.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:23:10 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, john.r.fastabend@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net_sched: sch_mqprio: dont leak kernel
memory
Le mercredi 26 janvier 2011 à 11:55 -0800, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> >
> > I think the best style to use memset so that any
> > possible struct padding is guaranteed to be zeroed.
>
> Such padding does not exist, and we won't add such padding since this is
> a user visible data structure and thus whose layout is cast in stone.
>
> Anyways, I'm ambivalent to how this is fixed actually.
I am perfectly aware of this ugly memset() style some people prefer, and
5 % of the time they swap 2nd and 3rd param.
Two patches instead of one ;)
In this particular case, I only used existing codestyle: In the same
file I noticed :
vi +322 net/sched/sch_mqprio.c
static int mqprio_dump_class_stats(struct Qdisc *sch, unsigned long cl,
struct gnet_dump *d)
{
struct net_device *dev = qdisc_dev(sch);
if (cl <= netdev_get_num_tc(dev)) {
int i;
struct Qdisc *qdisc;
struct gnet_stats_queue qstats = {0};
struct gnet_stats_basic_packed bstats = {0};
struct netdev_tc_txq tc = dev->tc_to_txq[cl - 1];
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists