[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110202154841.GB12738@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:48:41 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
Steve Dobbelstein <steved@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
mashirle@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network performance with small packets
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:42:51AM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 12:49 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:33:49PM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 23:14 -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> > > > w/i guest change, I played around the parameters,for example: I
> > could
> > > > get 3.7Gb/s with 42% CPU BW increasing from 2.5Gb/s for 1K message
> > > > size,
> > > > w/i dropping packet, I was able to get up to 6.2Gb/s with similar
> > CPU
> > > > usage.
> > >
> > > I meant w/o guest change, only vhost changes. Sorry about that.
> > >
> > > Shirley
> >
> > Ah, excellent. What were the parameters?
>
> I used half of the ring size 129 for packet counters, but the
> performance is still not as good as dropping packets on guest, 3.7 Gb/s
> vs. 6.2Gb/s.
>
> Shirley
And this is with sndbuf=0 in host, yes?
And do you see a lot of tx interrupts?
How packets per interrupt?
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists