netdev - Re: [PATCH] NETFILTER module xt_hmark new target for HASH MARK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D4BFD05.6030003@trash.net>
Date:	Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:20:05 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC:	Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>,
	"jengelh@...ozas.de" <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hans@...illstrom.com" <hans@...illstrom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NETFILTER module xt_hmark new target for HASH MARK

On 03.02.2011 16:42, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On 03/02/11 15:23, Hans Schillstrom wrote:
>>> If this is accepted, I think this has to be merge with the (already
>>> overloaded) MARK target.
>>
>> I have no opinion about that, others might have.
> 
> Better put it in the MARK target with a new revision. I think that
> Patrick is going to ask you this.
> 
> I don't know why I had the impression that MARK is overload, it's
> actually fine at a first glance to the code.

I don't think we should merge this with the MARK target, I don't
want to bloat the simple mark structure with all the parameters
needed for this module.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html