[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110205142648.GA9814@p183.telecom.by>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:26:48 +0200
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: sysctl: share ipv4/ipv6 sysctl tables
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 05:59:24PM +0200, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Finally share the leaf sysctl tables for ipv4/ipv6:
> >>
> >> [PATCH 4/5] ipv4: share sysctl net/ipv4/conf/DEVNAME/ tables
> >> [PATCH 5/5] ipv6: share sysctl net/ipv6/conf/DEVNAME/ tables
> >
> > Meh.
> >
> > First you remove ->parent, then heroically pass "struct file *"
> > to sysctl handlers which duplicates all information already passed
> > and brings dcache into picture.
> >
> > Binary sysctl rewrite confused you into thinking that d_name.name
> > is the way, but it isn't.
> > For binary sysctl(2) you wouldn't get d_name.name.
>
>
> Are you really sure?
>
> I ran this code on a machine with and without these patches. It seems
> to work fine.
>
> It reads the value from /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/default/tag and writes 42 back.
>
> I'm not sure what I have to do to pass the name of a device (e.g.
> "eth0") instead of "default" but at least "default" and "all" work and
> have valid dentries.
You do ->parent->procname.
But, but you removed parent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists