[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110207152048.22c51184.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 15:20:48 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, ghen@...enet.be
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 28512] New: IPv6 SLAAC address preferred over
static one as source address
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:15:16 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28512
>
> Summary: IPv6 SLAAC address preferred over static one as source
> address
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.36
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV6
> AssignedTo: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
> ReportedBy: ghen@...enet.be
> Regression: No
>
>
> Linux IPv6 source address selection rules are described here:
> http://www.davidc.net/networking/ipv6-source-address-selection-linux
>
> In case of a tie, "Linux chooses to use the latest address added".
>
> A very common tie is where a host has a SLAAC (Stateless address
> auto-configuration) address as well as one or more statically assigned ones in
> the same /64. The SLAAC address will almost always be the most recently
> "added" one, as it is renewed with every Router Advertisement on the network,
> and there will be a tie for all other rules.
>
> As a consequence, the kernel chooses this address by default for outgoing
> connections. This is usually not the preferred scenario; the static address
> will more likely have proper reverse DNS, be configured in ACL's, etc.
>
> This has been discussed on the ipv6-ops mailing list
> (ipv6-ops@...ts.cluenet.de), and a better suggestion for a tie-breaker came
> out: the preferred lifetime of the address.
>
> SLAAC addresses will have a limited preferred lifetime (as defined by the
> router), static addresses will usually have an unlimited preferred lifetime
> (0). So it makes a lot of sense to take this preferred lifetime into account
> for source address selection (how is it otherwise "preferred"?).
>
> This could be added as rule #9 before using the most recently added as a final
> tie breaker?
>
> Geert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists