[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110209074221.GA9790@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:42:21 +0100
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hadmut@...isch.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 28282] New: forwarding turns autoconfiguration off
Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com> :
[...]
> I believe there is a difference between being a router and merely
> being capable of forwarding IP packets. To me, a router participates
> in a routing protocol and/or advertises routes/prefixes. So perhaps
> Hadmut has a valid point that autoconfiguration should not depend
> on ip_forward being off, although I'm not sure what the appropriate
> alternate test for not being a router should be.
It is here (same document, same page):
[...]
2. Terminology
IP - Internet Protocol Version 6. The terms IPv4 and IPv6 are used
only in contexts where necessary to avoid ambiguity.
node - a device that implements IP.
router - a node that forwards IP packets not explicitly addressed to
itself.
Why should we put our brains at pain ? Is there really a problem ?
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists