netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for February 3 (netfilter)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D52BC47.8080709@trash.net>
Date:	Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:09:43 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 3 (netfilter)

Am 09.02.2011 16:51, schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On 02/08/11 23:21, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Am 04.02.2011 20:15, schrieb Randy Dunlap:
>>> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:00:34 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20110202:
>>>
>>> When SYSCTL and PROC_FS and NETFILTER_NETLINK are not enabled:
>>>
>>> net/built-in.o: In function `try_to_load_type':
>>> ip_set_core.c:(.text+0x3ab49): undefined reference to `nfnl_unlock'
>>> ip_set_core.c:(.text+0x3ab4e): undefined reference to `nfnl_lock'
>>
>> Does this patch fix the problem?
> 
> Yes, it does.  Thanks.
> 
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> 

Thanks, I'll push it upstream with my next batch of patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html