[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297761225.21980.3663.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:13:45 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arp_notify: unconditionally send gratuitous ARP for
NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEERS.
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 01:46 +0000, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:44:16 +0000
>
> > NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEER is an explicit request by the driver to send a link
> > notification while NETDEV_UP/NETDEV_CHANGEADDR generate link
> > notifications as a sort of side effect.
> >
> > In the later cases the sysctl option is present because link
> > notification events can have undesired effects e.g. if the link is
> > flapping. I don't think this applies in the case of an explicit
> > request from a driver.
> >
> > This patch makes NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEER unconditional, if preferred we
> > could add a new sysctl for this case which defaults to on.
> >
> > This change causes Xen post-migration ARP notifications (which cause
> > switches to relearn their MAC tables etc) to be sent by default.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
>
> Ok, applied, thanks.
Thanks.
I nearly forgot -- the NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEER stuff was tagged for
stable/longterm backport (it appeared in 2.6.32.19 or so). I think this
change should likewise go back, what do you think?
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists