[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110215.103159.193730541.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:31:59 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, shawn.guo@...escale.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] net/fec: release mem_region requested in probe
in error path and remove
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:53:05 +0100
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:05:49AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> These merge commits look ugly and Linus wants them minimized.
> Hmm, right, I don't get why this looks uglier for Linus than a merge of
> a tree that bases on something you already have. I guess you're too
> annoyed by now to explain why you think it does.
What's so hard to understand about the fact that when I pull from
someone I do not want any commits unrelated to the work that person
is sending me?
>> Either you follow the rules and my expectations, which is that when you
>> give me a GIT tree to pull from it's based upon one of my trees, or
>> I don't pull from you.
> So I rebased my tree on something older. It now starts at
>
> c69b909 (pch_can: fix module reload issue with MSI)
>
> which is already in net-next/master.
You need to send a new pull request so that it gets properly tracked
in patchwork.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists