[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D5BFB39.8070805@ka9q.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:28:41 -0800
From: Phil Karn <karn@...q.net>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
CC: kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off-by-one error in net/8021q/vlan.c
On 2/16/11 8:10 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Phil Karn <karn@...q.net> wrote:
>> On 2/16/11 4:51 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Phil Karn <karn@...q.net> wrote:
>>>> The range check on vlan_id in register_vlan_device is off by one, and it
>>>> prevents the creation of a vlan interface for vlan ID 4095. (OSX allows
>>>> this, I checked.)
>>>
>>> Then OSX should fix their code. 4095 is reserved.
>>>
>>
>> If it's reserved, then it's up to the user to reserve it.
>
> No.
>
> See:
> http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.1Q-2005.pdf
>
Well, then I guess we all know better than the user. That's the Windows
Way...no, wait, I thought this is Linux.
The fact is that I did encounter a misconfigured switch using vlan 4095,
and because of this off-by-one error I was unable to talk to it and fix it.
I was hoping I wouldn't have to patch every new kernel I install.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists