[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1297874372.30541.29.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:39:32 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Phil Karn <karn@...q.net>
Cc: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Off-by-one error in net/8021q/vlan.c
Le mercredi 16 février 2011 à 08:28 -0800, Phil Karn a écrit :
> On 2/16/11 8:10 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Phil Karn <karn@...q.net> wrote:
> >> On 2/16/11 4:51 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Phil Karn <karn@...q.net> wrote:
> >>>> The range check on vlan_id in register_vlan_device is off by one, and it
> >>>> prevents the creation of a vlan interface for vlan ID 4095. (OSX allows
> >>>> this, I checked.)
> >>>
> >>> Then OSX should fix their code. 4095 is reserved.
> >>>
> >>
> >> If it's reserved, then it's up to the user to reserve it.
> >
> > No.
> >
> > See:
> > http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.1Q-2005.pdf
> >
>
> Well, then I guess we all know better than the user. That's the Windows
> Way...no, wait, I thought this is Linux.
>
> The fact is that I did encounter a misconfigured switch using vlan 4095,
> and because of this off-by-one error I was unable to talk to it and fix it.
>
> I was hoping I wouldn't have to patch every new kernel I install.
>
You can use an OSX gateway ;)
If we allow ID 4095, then some users will complain we violate rules.
Really you cannot push this patch in official kernel only to ease your
life ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists