netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] tproxy: do not assign timewait sockets to skb->sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D5CFB0D.9050704@trash.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:40:13 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
CC:	KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@...abit.hu>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@...abit.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tproxy: do not assign timewait sockets to skb->sk

Am 16.02.2011 12:30, schrieb Florian Westphal:
> KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@...abit.hu> wrote:
>> On 02/14/2011 04:51 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> Looks fine to me. Balazs. Krisztian, any objections?
>>
>> Seems to be OK, as far as I can see.
>>
>> Florian, did you make sure the tests still run after applying this patch?
>>
>> http://git.balabit.hu/?p=bazsi/tproxy-test.git;a=summary
> 
> Thanks for the hint, I cloned this and ran it on my test setup:
> ./tproxy-test.py
> [..]
> PASS: ('192.168.10.8', 50080), we got a connection as we deserved
> PASS: everything is fine

Applied, thanks everyone.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html