[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298059106.2425.31.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:58:26 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
fubar@...ibm.com, nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6] net: convert bonding to use rx_handler
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 20:28 +0100, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> Yes I saw this. We would have to do something like:
>
> struct skb_rx_context {
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> struct net_device *orig_dev;
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct skb_rx_context, skb_rx_context);
>
> and then in __netif_receive_skb():
>
> struct skb_rx_context *cont = __this_cpu_read(skb_rx_context);
>
> if (cont->skb != skb) {
> cont->skb = skb;
> orig_dev = cont->orig_dev = skb->dev;
> } else {
> orig_dev = cont->orig_dev;
> }
>
>
> Does this make sense?
Well, yes, something like that, but I think you dont need to keep a
pointer to current skb. (It would not work if one handled/freed, same
'skb pointer' is reused a bit later)
Sorry, I wont have time to look at this right now, its now 21h00 in
France, time to get some time with family ;)
See you !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists