[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D5FA1D7.4050801@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:56:23 +0100
From: Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kaber@...sh.net,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 V3] net: convert bonding to use rx_handler
Le 19/02/2011 09:05, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> This patch converts bonding to use rx_handler. Results in cleaner
> __netif_receive_skb() with much less exceptions needed. Also
> bond-specific work is moved into bond code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko<jpirko@...hat.com>
>
> v1->v2:
> using skb_iif instead of new input_dev to remember original
> device
> v2->v3:
> set orig_dev = skb->dev if skb_iif is set
>
Why do we need to let the rx_handlers call netif_rx() or __netif_receive_skb()?
Bonding used to be handled with very few overhead, simply replacing skb->dev with skb->dev->master.
Time has passed and we eventually added many special processing for bonding into
__netif_receive_skb(), but the overhead remained very light.
Calling netif_rx() (or __netif_receive_skb()) to allow nesting would probably lead to some overhead.
Can't we, instead, loop inside __netif_receive_skb(), and deliver whatever need to be delivered, to
whoever need, inside the loop ?
rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
while (rx_handler) {
/* ... */
orig_dev = skb->dev;
skb = rx_handler(skb);
/* ... */
rx_handler = (skb->dev != orig_dev) ? rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler) : NULL;
}
This would reduce the overhead, while still allowing nesting: vlan on top on bonding, bridge on top
on bonding, ...
That way, we can probably keep the list of crossed devices inside a local array, and call
deliver_skb() with the current "orig_dev" when appropriate. No need to overload sk_buff nor to use a
global variable.
Of course, this might be a very simplistic view.
Any comments?
Nicolas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists