[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110221180646.GD11864@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:06:46 -0500
From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: bond_select_queue off by one
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:06:12PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 17:49 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > @@ -2194,6 +2194,21 @@ static inline bool skb_rx_queue_recorded(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> > return skb->queue_mapping != 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void skb_record_tx_queue(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 tx_queue)
> > +{
> > + skb->queue_mapping = tx_queue + 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u16 skb_get_tx_queue(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + return skb->queue_mapping - 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool skb_tx_queue_recorded(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + return skb->queue_mapping != 0;
> > +}
> > +
> [...]
>
> This is nonsense. After the TX queue has been selected, it's recorded
> in queue_mapping *without* the offset (skb_set_queue_mapping()).
>
I see that now. Yay for symmetry! :)
I'm actually looking over this now and will post a tested patch to
address the original reporter's problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists