netdev - RE: [PATCH 3/5] r8169: fix the wrong parameter of point address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:46:02 +0800
From:	hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:	'Francois Romieu' <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] r8169: fix the wrong parameter of point address

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@...zoreil.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 4:22 PM
> To: Hayeswang
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] r8169: fix the wrong parameter of 
> point address
> 
> Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> :
> > Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> :
> > > Correct the parameter of rtl8168_oob_notify. It results 
> in the wrong 
> > > point address and influences RTL8168DP.
> > 
> > Please send this one separately as a patch against current 
> kernel tree 
> > as it is clearly a bugfix. The remaining patches are probably more 
> > -next material.
> 
> Correct me if I am wrong:
> - #3 and #1 are bugfixes
> - can you specify if #4 and #5 are either bugfixes, 
> optimizations or cleanups ?
> - #2 adds support for a new chipset

#1, #3, #4 are bugfixes.
#2 adds support for a new chipset
#5 is cleanup.

I would separate them and send the patches again.

 
Best Regards,
Hayes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html