| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <F0C0A9D890424ECAAB19523FCC4A2FCC@realtek.com.tw> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:46:02 +0800 From: hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> To: 'Francois Romieu' <romieu@...zoreil.com> CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] r8169: fix the wrong parameter of point address > -----Original Message----- > From: Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@...zoreil.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 4:22 PM > To: Hayeswang > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] r8169: fix the wrong parameter of > point address > > Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> : > > Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> : > > > Correct the parameter of rtl8168_oob_notify. It results > in the wrong > > > point address and influences RTL8168DP. > > > > Please send this one separately as a patch against current > kernel tree > > as it is clearly a bugfix. The remaining patches are probably more > > -next material. > > Correct me if I am wrong: > - #3 and #1 are bugfixes > - can you specify if #4 and #5 are either bugfixes, > optimizations or cleanups ? > - #2 adds support for a new chipset #1, #3, #4 are bugfixes. #2 adds support for a new chipset #5 is cleanup. I would separate them and send the patches again. Best Regards, Hayes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists