netdev - Re: why all packets have same queue no when rps enabled?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1298353270.3360.1.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:41:10 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jon Zhou <Jon.Zhou@...u.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: why all packets have same queue no when rps enabled?

Le lundi 21 février 2011 à 20:07 -0800, Jon Zhou a écrit :
> Hi
> 
> I expect each incoming packet will have a different queue no. when I enabled RPS on kernel 2.6.36.4
> 
> cat /sys/class/net/eth4/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
> 00000000,000000ff
> 
> CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       CPU4       CPU5       CPU6       CPU7       CPU8       CPU9       CPU10      CPU11      CPU12      CPU13      CPU14      CPU15      CPU16
>       CPU17      CPU18      CPU19      CPU20      CPU21      CPU22      CPU23      CPU24      CPU25      CPU26      CPU27      CPU28      CPU29      CPU30      CPU31
>      HI:          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0
>          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0
>    TIMER:    6027512     710165    2623243     542768     427807     217424     192940     217043          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0
>          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0
>   NET_TX:    1365741         59     750957          0        171          0          3          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0
>          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0          0
>   NET_RX:   40465750   11140803    8545859   14417762    8913471   12298691   14216845    3348431   < ---- indeed spread across cpus
> 
> 
> I manually disable RSS on the intel X520 multiqueue supported NIC.
> Cat /proc/interrupts
> 
>   87:   21348294          0          0          0          0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      eth4-rx-0
>   88:      38394          0          0          0          0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      eth4-tx-0
> 
> 
> 
> When I tried the below program to filter packet by queue no.I got these results:
> 
> struct sock_filter BPF_code[]= {     
>     { 0x28,0,0,SKF_AD_OFF+SKF_AD_QUEUE},
>     { 0x15, 0, 1, 0x00000001 },
>     { 0x6, 0, 0, 0x0000ffff },
>     { 0x6, 0, 0, 0x00000000 }
>   };
> 
>   struct sock_fprog Filter; 
>     
>   Filter.len = 4;//15;
>   Filter.filter = BPF_code;
>   
>   if ( (sock=socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_IP)))<0) {
>     perror("socket");
>     exit(1);
>   }
> 
>   /* Set the network card in promiscuos mode */
>   strncpy(ethreq.ifr_name,"eth4",IFNAMSIZ);
>   if (ioctl(sock,SIOCGIFFLAGS,&ethreq)==-1) {
>     perror("ioctl");
>     close(sock);
>     exit(1);
>   }
>   ethreq.ifr_flags|=IFF_PROMISC;
>   if (ioctl(sock,SIOCSIFFLAGS,&ethreq)==-1) {
>     perror("ioctl");
>     close(sock);
>     exit(1);
>   }
> 
>   /* Attach the filter to the socket */
>   if(setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_FILTER,&Filter, sizeof(Filter))<0){
>     perror("setsockopt");
>     close(sock);
>     exit(1);
>   }
>   static int count = 0;
>   while (1) {
>     printf("#%d----------\n",count++);
>     n = recvfrom(sock,buffer,2048,0,NULL,NULL);
>     printf("%d bytes read\n",n);
> ...
> }
> 
> 
> Looks almost all packets fall at same queue?
> Will RPS allocate queue no for each packet? and what hash algorithm rps used? (is it Toeplitz hash algorithm?)
> 

I believe you are mistaken.

RPS is not there to spread load on _all_ cpus, but to use a hash
function so that all packets of a given flow are directed to a given
cpu.

If you receive 1.000.000 packets of the same flow, they all are
delivered to one CPU.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html