[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110223.141723.39169376.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:17:23 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net,
Juliusz.Chroboczek@....jussieu.fr, linville@...driver.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net_sched: long word align struct qdisc_skb_cb data
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:30:01 -0800
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:05:07 +0100
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Le mercredi 23 février 2011 à 17:24 +0100, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
>> > Am 23.02.2011 16:14, schrieb Eric Dumazet:
>> > > diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> > > index 16626a0..f40d32e 100644
>> > > --- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> > > +++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> > > @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct tcf_proto {
>> > >
>> > > struct qdisc_skb_cb {
>> > > unsigned int pkt_len;
>> > > + unsigned int sfb_classid;
>> > > char data[];
>> > > };
>> >
>> > This could be moved into a SFB specific cb, similar to what netem
>> > does.
>>
>> Hmm... well... I want to be sure no other sch will destroy my values.
>>
>> netem seems buggy then.
>>
>> Probably following patch is needed ?
>
> Yes, it was long word aligned when netem was written but
> we seem to have bit creep.
Applied to net-2.6, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists