[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110223002622.GI22597@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:26:24 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: fix dst_lock locking on dest update
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:40:25AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Fix dst_lock usage in __ip_vs_update_dest. We need
> _bh locking because destination is updated in user context.
> Can cause lockups on frequent destination updates.
> Problem reported by Simon Kirby. Bug was introduced
> in 2.6.37 from the "ipvs: changes for local real server"
> change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> ---
>
> Dave, please apply to net-2.6.
> Patch is for 2.6.37+ and applies to 2.6.38-rc6. There is
> little fuzz when applying to net-next, let me know if
> I should provide patch for other trees.
>
> --- linux-2.6.37/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c 2011-01-06 00:01:23.600069161 +0200
> +++ linux/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c 2011-02-19 23:14:44.463250743 +0200
> @@ -810,9 +810,9 @@ __ip_vs_update_dest(struct ip_vs_service
> dest->u_threshold = udest->u_threshold;
> dest->l_threshold = udest->l_threshold;
>
> - spin_lock(&dest->dst_lock);
> + spin_lock_bh(&dest->dst_lock);
> ip_vs_dst_reset(dest);
> - spin_unlock(&dest->dst_lock);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&dest->dst_lock);
>
> if (add)
> ip_vs_new_estimator(&dest->stats);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists