[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFA5C641DD.CCB1702C-ON65257840.0024C22E-65257840.002545D9@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:18:36 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: anthony@...emonkey.ws, arnd@...db.de, avi@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [v3 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote on 02/23/2011 12:09:15 PM:
Hi Michael,
> > Yes. Michael Tsirkin had wanted to see how the MQ RX patch
> > would look like, so I was in the process of getting the two
> > working together. The patch is ready and is being tested.
> > Should I send a RFC patch at this time?
>
> Yes, please do.
Sure, will get a build/test on latest bits and send in 1-2 days.
> > The TX-only patch helped the guest TX path but didn't help
> > host->guest much (as tested using TCP_MAERTS from the guest).
> > But with the TX+RX patch, both directions are getting
> > improvements.
>
> Also, my hope is that with appropriate queue mapping,
> we might be able to do away with heuristics to detect
> single stream load that TX only code needs.
Yes, that whole stuff is removed, and the TX/RX path is
unchanged with this patch (thankfully :)
> > Remote testing is still to be done.
>
> Others might be able to help here once you post the patch.
That's great, will appreciate any help.
Thanks,
- KK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists