[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim4g8eRBvbO4aGUm9oZaz4txBCH9nD3JO7skscB@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:35:10 -0800
From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
To: chriss <mail_to_chriss@....net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.37 regression: adding main interface to a bridge breaks vlan
interface RX
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:22 AM, chriss <mail_to_chriss@....net> wrote:
> Nicolas de Pesloüan <nicolas.2p.debian <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I think you should have a look at ebtables command, in particular, the
> BROUTING chain of broute
>> table. If this chain ask the packet to be dropped, then bridge will ignore it
> and give a chance to
>> the upper layer to use it. Upper layer might be IP, or in your particular
> setup, VLAN.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Nicolas.
>
> Thank you very much for the ebtables hint.
>
> I also tried to add the vlan to my bridge device but only droping the vlan
> tagged paket with ebtables got it working.
>
> I'm not sure if this is the wanted behavior for bridging vlan actions.
> ..or my network setup is just to ..f%%%'ed up?!
It should work even without ebtables (running vlan on top of bridge,
not side by side). I'll try to look at this in the next couple of
days.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists